The Holy Video Triumvirate: Viddler, Vimeo & YouTube
Posted on July 13, 2009 by
You’ve planned. Storyboarded. Worked with company spokespeople on messaging. Identified goals. Spent three hours filming and 24 hours editing. And now you have a concise video masterpiece of corporate vision. What’s next?
Surprise! The success of a video often depends on the promotional campaign that a superstar PR team creates around it even more than the original content. However, part of a strong promotional campaign is identifying, with your client, the goals of the video and then finding the right site on which to host a video to help achieve those goals. Where you host the video matters. Sometimes a lot.
There are a variety of hosting sites on the Web nowadays, but YouTube, Viddler and Vimeo have emerged as three of the best. More a bit later on why they make my top three list. (Readers, feel free to disagree with me or suggest others in the comments.)
First, all three offer similar basic services and offerings (public and private viewing options, statistics about how the video is faring on the site, etc.) and most agree that choosing one comes down to what you hope to achieve with your video.
Every company has different specific hopes for a video, but there are a few broad goals that we PR folks always aim for:
- Reach a wide audience. Even if the video is targeted at a specific group of people you still want access to the highest contingent of that group.
- Present that audience with a quality viewing experience (i.e. smooth playing, clear visuals and sound, etc.). No one wants to watch a choppy video.
- Have an easy back-end experience. Hard-working, time-crunched PR reps don’t want to deal with a lengthy, complex or buggy upload process.
With that in mind…
Until recently, I used to hear people say “If you want to tell the world, use YouTube. If you want to show the world, use Vimeo.” Early on, YouTube was known for an extremely large and active user community but also for shortcomings in video quality. Fuzzy images, choppy sound and other performance snags were common.
Vimeo differentiated itself with higher quality viewer experience by becoming the first site to enable HD video sharing. However, uploading videos to the site – a slow process – made reaping the benefits inefficient.
Viddler, when it launched, was knocking socks off – and being praised favorably over YouTube — with its clean UI, ease of use, speedy uploading and easy browsing. But it lacked (and still does) the enormous community of YouTube.
Over the past few years, and especially as more and more hosting sites cropped up, it seemed that compromise was the name of the game. You could have a wide audience, a quality viewing experience or a smooth back-end process, but not all three.
However, YouTube changed all that – and in my opinion justified its position as the number one video hosting site — by enabling HD video sharing last year. Add to this jump in quality the fine-tuning they have done on the uploading side and the unparalleled user base, and YouTube became my one-stop shop for meeting almost all client PR goals.
The important thing to remember, though, is that the success of a video depends on the time and energy taken to put it together, and the traction of a video depends more on the PR campaign than on where the video is housed. You can’t go wrong with any of the three sites discussed above, but having access to YouTube’s vast potential audience – and recognizable brand name — at your fingertips is nothing but an asset.
I’m curious, though. What do you all think? Anyone have great (or terrible) experiences with these sites you care to share?













Do you have what it takes to be a social media consultant?